Get Tim Larkin's self defense email newsletter, "Secrets for staying alive when rules don't apply," and enter for your chance to attend a $797 live training seminar -- free.
Target Focus Training Products

Extensive selection of instructional tools utilizing all forms of media that take you from base principles to complete and immediately useable applications of the entire TFT System.

Target Focus Training
The fastest way to ingrain the TFT System into your subconscious is to follow a specific path of instruction. Now there are two ways to accomplish this.

UFC 106 MMA Fighters Repeatly Stopped By Basic Self Defense Moves

November 23, 2009 by Tim Larkin

Koscheck and Johnson Stopped By Basic Self Defense Moves

Koscheck and Johnson Stopped By Basic Self Defense Moves

So as I watched UFC 106 the other night it was interesting to see the Koscheck/Johnson fight repeatedly stopped by the referee for “illegal” strikes on at least 3 occasions during the match. Now I absolutely agree that in a combat sport match the rules need to be adhered to so the fighters are allowed to pit their athleticism and skill in a controlled setting to see who can win.

Here is an excerpt from a report on the fight:

“The bizarre nature of the fight began in the first round. When Koscheck was down on both knees, Johnson threw a huge knee, sending Koscheck to the canvas. Johnson was immediately apologetic, as he knew that he had screwed up, but that didn’t help as Johnson was deducted a point. After quite a few minutes and a check by the fight doctor, Koscheck returned to the fight to immediately take over the first round, and win the round using wrestling.

The fight continued to get weird as Johnson, who was reported to be fighting at 200 lbs, was then on the receiving side of two unintentional eye pokes. Johnson is especially sensitive to eye pokes, as he was on the bad end of a terrible eye poke against Kevin Burns, and had to have surgery to correct eye problems.

When Johnson returned to fight, the two started the slugfest fans were expecting until Koscheck took Johnson down and started to ground and pound. He took Johnson’s back, and sunk in a rear naked choke with just seconds left in the second round….”

As I watched the match it was amazing to see how two highly conditioned MMA fighters could absorb numerous kicks and punches to the body yet as soon as they were injured they were helpless. For all 3 of the “illegal” strikes the referee had to intervene to protect the other fighter as he was unable to continue for a short time. On the street this would’ve been the time the other guy would finished the man.

All three of the “illegal” strikes are basic to any self defense program and none of the 3 strikes were thrown with real intent or follow through by either fighter yet still would’ve got the job done on the street. Nor does it take a lot of skill and ability to quick learn any of them.

So this should be a good template for any of you that think being bigger, faster, and stronger is the ultimate answer when it comes to surviving real violence. Learning to injure is the most direct path to shutting down another human.

Until next time,

Tim Larkin
TFT Group

PS: To get a complete library on “Illegal” moves that can save your life check out our Striking DVD program . It wont help you in the Octagon but it’s great for shutting down killers!

Bookmark and Share

Is Extreme Self Defense Murder? The Times of London Thinks So…

November 20, 2009 by Tim Larkin

Looks like the UK press is still wrestling with the idea that in a life or death criminal assault effective self defense may mean you need to injure the assailant. I was interviewed for this article last month from arguably the worlds most prestigious newspaper, The Times of London.

The reporter was a very nice guy and seemed interested in the subject but uncomfortable with what it takes to survive in an extreme asocial criminal assault. Again the writer focused on the injuries an innocent person would put on the criminal that initiated the unprovoked potentially lethal attack.

There seems to be a disconnect about the fact the assailant attacked the innocent person with intent to do grievous bodily harm (GBH). But maybe I’m biased…

Read the article and let me know your thoughts on the subject. Is it extreme self defense or murder OR maybe just effective self protection?

Bookmark and Share